Saturday, 27 August 2016

date: 7 May 2013 at 19:06 subject: Response from NHPPA | Linda Ley | NHPPA E-Blast: December 1 2012 | Shawn's New Article in Alive Magazine: Safe or Unsafe? : Important mainly because of the people in the conversation.

NHPPA info@nhppa.org

07/05/2013
to me


from:NHPPA info@nhppa.org
reply-to:info@nhppa.org
to:abcdefgsusieq4u@gmail.com
date:7 May 2013 at 19:06
subject:Response from NHPPA | Linda Ley | NHPPA E-Blast: December 1 2012 | Shawn's New Article in Alive Magazine: Safe or Unsafe?
:Important mainly because of the people in the conversation.
Hello Linda,

Thank you so much for your email, which has been passed to Shawn for his information. Our apologies that it has taken so long to get back to you. We work on an extremely tight budget, trying to make best use of our supporters’ financial help as our only source of income. Since so much of our work involves expensive legal research and the funding of lectures and interviews, we have had to economize on clerical workers and online staff for responding to inquiries in order to keep our core work going.

You are of course right that the current situation is unconstitutional, and it takes a keen legal mind to see that. Your considered and remarkably accurate email gives us pause to think that someone like yourself is able to carry gravity in conversation when educating the public in your sphere of influence.

We are fortunate to have Shawn's experience of constitutional law behind our legal challenge to Health Canada and the 2004 NHP Regulations but we have not stopped there. You can CLICK HERE to see the variety of legal frameworks we plan to refer to when we get to court. We have assembled a team of legal experts with experience in each field and they have completed their research. We are currently at the point of identifying parties with standing to be part of our case.

We do know of other organizations which are trying different legal approaches, they may well be invoking grounds that are different than ours. We all do what we know best and together we hope that the joint pushback from citizens and stakeholders will restore our rights and freedoms.

As the lawyers research, there are many things that citizens can do to get the word out to our elected representatives that we won’t have our freedom to choose taken away from us. We encourage everyone who writes to us to also write or visit their MP. You can CLICK HERE for some tools to help with this. We are also asking everyone to check that their local health food store has a petition station. The Charter of Health Freedom petitionhas just passed 90,000 signatures. It is currently set to become the third largest federal petition in the last 15 years,in Canada. We have to beat 96,065 and when we do, it will create quite a stir when we take it to Ottawa.
If your local store needs information materials, or if you can think of anywhere else to place a petition, you canCLICK HERE for more details and printable files.

Thank you for your personal involvement. Our freedom will be restored by citizens like you who take the time to engage and communicate!

Regards,

~ Carolyn

Protecting your access and freedom,
Carolyn Steele | Information Officer | NHPPA | 1.519.648.2050 | 5070 Fountain Street North, Breslau, ON N0B 1M0

cid:image001.png@01CBEF89.E439EAB0

Join NHPPA on Facebook | Follow NHPPA on Twitter | Watch us on YouTube


Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: NHPPA E-Blast: December 1 2012 | Shawn's New Article in Alive Magazine: Safe or Unsafe?
  
Many thanks for the information and the work you are doing towards this cause.

But I am asking the question - what else is possible here?

I worked at the Constitutional Law Branch in Toronto a few years back and have had several other "legal" administrative positions over the years for the government.  I also have experience in records and information management.

What I am getting at is that this cause needs to be tied together with some history and a better approach legally and in the courts. 

What we have here is an elite society that has written their intent to poison the public and they have done it over the last 70 years through legislation and controls and regulations.  It is well known that our foods have been poisoned with GMO's and that federal agencies refuse to label or advise of foods unsafe - or believe reports other than from the pharmeceutical and pesticide corporations.  There are whistle blowers everywhere that are afraid to talk or have been frightened enough to stay silent - or have been financially ruined to keep them off their ass.  It starts to get messy when big corporations fall - ask Enron.

And perhaps the key here may be corporation law........ (I believe there individual stakeholders that are using corporate and administrative approaches for their independent legal actions but since Shawn and his team developed the strategy and completed the research, grounds relating to what she is referring to may or may not be in our approach.) step outside the box - take a look at the whole picture and the cause.  Instead of playing the game of masking symptoms - cure the cause.

As a citizen of canada I am a part of the "franchise" of Her Majesty in England.  The country is a legal entity - it's set up as a franchise - and the politicians are employees. The Queen is the ultimate employer.....  What does that make the citizens who financially support the corporation of the Dominion of Canada?   Articles of Incorporation should be public knowledge.  There are corporations set up everywhere to fund the elite.  Canon Law, British Law, Canadian Law , Corporate Law- what law governs the people of any country? What law governs the government?  Are we the product or service of the corporation?  What law has precedence over whom? (She is asking questions that Shawn or Selick can respond to but I don’t feel like engaging with her here a) because I can’t answer and b) because it’s a time sink) 

 The country's laws keep changing over the years to protect the guilty.  follow the money , follow the family, follow the elite- the country is in this for profit and it's coming from 99% of the population and going to only 1% of those in power.  What law can the people use against a country that in one generation convinces it's subjects to smoke cigarettes (more doctors smoke camels) and in another generation, promotes anti depressants for kids, puts GMO in the food supply, poisons 10,000 year old water aquifers with chlorine and flouride,  puts millions into new schools and training of a whole generation again in caring for an ageing and ill baby boomer generation created by their actions of affecting the health of us loyal subjects.  Are you aware that a whole workforce of RPN's has been retrained to do the same job as an RN at half the cost?  and Personal Support Workers do the job of an RPN at yet half that cost.   Yup - learned that one from an RPN and former real estate agent. (us 50 somethings are having a hard time with getting to retirement without retraining these days.)

What I am getting at is - figure out the conspiracy theory - who the real players are here and then hit them below the belt where they least expect it. Get into the Enron of Records Management techniques.  Natural products can't be trademarked and made money off them. (It's why Hemp is illegal - it would have killed the cancer cure industry they were creating.....)  Wouldn't the same principle apply to licencing?  We already have a constitution for the people - lets enforce it and then this whole Charter of Health Freedoms isn't necessary - make it a codicil to the original Charter.....make a law that is undeniably accurate and does not require interpretation......black ball em.....list specifics, names, etc..... (Ug)

In just over two decades, the Constitution Act, 1982 has had a predictably enormous impact on constitutional law. The most important section of the Constitution Act, 1982, both for the legal community and for the general population, has been the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter"). The Supreme Court of Canada has spent most of the past twenty years interpreting the Charter, an in so doing, has caused governments and lawyers to rewrite the basic rules of almost every area of public law.

Before the Charter came into effect, Canadian law had a melange of legal human rights protections. For the average person, they worked very well, although what most people now consider enormous injustices were legally inflicted on some. The Supreme Court of Canada held that the Unwritten Constitution protected some human rights. In Roncarelli v.Duplessis, [1959] 121., the Court ruled that the Constitution protected the people from arbitrary action by government officials. The federal government enacted the Canadian Bill of Rights in 1960, although it is now remembered mainly for the occasions that courts refused to apply it. In addition, some provinces had human rights legislation which forbade people from exercising their civil rights in discriminatory ways. However, as a general rule, no instrument permitted courts to strike down laws which violated human rights. This changed in 1982 by virtue of s. 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982, which stated that any law that violated the Constitution, including the new part of the Constitution containing theCharter, was of no force or effect.

In order to give full effect to the Charter, the Supreme Court of Canada decided to give the Charter a "broad and liberal interpretation." (R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295). The Court adopted a "purposive" approach, asking what the purpose of protecting the rights in question are, and giving effect to those purposes through the Court's interpretations of their meanings. This contrasts with the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Canadian Bill of Rights, in which the meaning of the words of the Bill were interpreted so narrowly that the Bill protected virtually no rights in practice.

According to s.32, the Charter applies to "the Parliament and government of Canada" and the "legislature and government of each province". It does not apply to private individuals or corporations   http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Canadian_Constitutional_Law/Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms

Will we need licences to grow tomatoes next?   It is only when we add unnatural ingredients that they have the control is it not? And yet they ad unnatural ingredients to our water and food supply and years later we find out it's killing us.....and they profit both ways - from the use and the after effect....... And yet natural hemp oil that cures cancer and almost any disease on the planet is illegal?  Why?

The Rick Simpson Story - Run From The Cure   But when you research the reason it is illegal and realize the propaganda that has been spread by our own country over the years and how its affected the health of the people - surely will find some legal law that can expel some government officials with enough proof - just like Mr. Ford was deposed as Mayor of Toronto Recently. 

Apparently there is some legislation somewhere that if a politician lies in office or does something for personal financial gain or something - they gotta leave?  How does corporate law work with directors that do the same thing?  If the constitution doesn't cover corporations  or individuals - does that mean we have no rights?  That the game is rigged?  Elections Act - I mean - when a constitution of a country is created - somewhere in there it's gotta read we have the right to life and if your own mother is poisoning you so she can create jobs and hospitals and rich politicians and unethical corporations for her own financial gain - well something has got to be illegal somewhere.

I mean - I work all my life for a pension that may not now be guaranteed to me in 7 years time.  I am currently unemployed and have been for 16 months.  I can't even get a response from, Walmart,  Mikey Dees or Timmy's for a minimum wage job. (Oh boy)  My locked in pension that they allowed me to access - resulted in me owing 40 grand in taxes, I am currently bankrupt and have about enough money left to live 2 more months where I am right now.  Most of my earned rrsp and locked in pension funds has dwindled and I'm two years short of early retirement.  Don't qualify for disability pensions because I refuse to take the meds.  (don't get me going on the psych part of this story - if you think Timmy's is a licence for money - you should see the mental health side of any general hospital)  My EI is exhausted for this lifetime as I have now collected for two years straight - 2009 and 20011/12 in 40 years - and without finding work - no more help.  Welfare in Ontario - gone - it's Ontario Works now - $599 a month and I gotta spend my bank account and get down to my last $599 before I can apply.  I'm two years short of early retirement pension at 60.  Not sure what the new year will bring.....but I'm working on believing in miracles here.

So.....I followed the rules all my life - I played the game they kept changing and then 2008 rolls around and Wham Bam Thank You Maam........they pull the rug out because of the world financial crisis.....   Now it's strange that we keep bailing out the crooked bankers and politicians instead of hitting them where we can - in the archives.  Yes - as of Jan 1 of this year - it's now covered under Freedom of Information and that's where they got ya.  They keep it hidden.  But some corporate records are public - like municipal roll books and Land Registry Offices and Corporate Nuances.  And some private records are always public for the money,  Hell, for 20 bucks you can get a name and address with a plate you see off the highway.  Personal freedoms are breached everywhere.  It's open season on us these days between Iran, the States and Mother Nature, Insurance and Flouride in our water.   You pay ma bell to see what number is calling you and they pay ma bell to hide their number so it comes up as unlisted........happens all the frikin time.  Ma Bell gets double the money and neither customer gets a phone number that they paid for.

 Get "natural" corporations to band together for one source of information - greater strength in numbers and we're all on the same side - many natural cures. - massage therapists, reflexologists, holistic doctors, naturopaths.  I bet if you came up with a conference to coordinate - you'd get a lot of attendees.

Find where they've changed the laws and haven't had the foresight to change other laws to correspond....... just find the reasons, the backers and the truths and put them all together and .over 70 years there has got to be mistakes.  Follow the money.  check out online about the corporations set up by Canada such as our Canada Pension Funds.  Check out these "corporations" and see who the shareholders and owners are - one to start with - ALL the federally deregulated corporations like Air Canada, Canadian Airlines, CNR, CPR, CBC, CRTC, Communications Canada,  see who owns them now and see who controls the country.  It's all corporations.  Yes - go back to 1996 and then go back to the  40's, 50's 60's and 70's and 80's and see where the changes were made - which political party -and better still - who was with that political party - who he smoozed with - do you know that Liberals and Conservatives only changes sides when the money is good?  Find out which privatized federal corporations sold "assets" to which private corporations and then follow the money.......  Start an org chart of business and show the connection and start with the top - the queen........it's a pyramid scheme no?  And check out which pharmaceutical company has control over Canada - it's Pftzer I believe. 

So let's get them in corporate law - civil law - mass law suits from the people - never mind trying to fight a bear in his own den on a charter of rights that will only be ignored after inception  - or a pig in the mud hole -  they've been swindling us for almost a hundred years and they friggin enjoy mud on their face and all over their bodies....a pig loves the mud....... if not more -    It's time to stop the swine flu once and for all   99% can let the 1% know that enough is enough.  They are killing us with their pharmaceuticals, GMOs and corporate greed.
  
Okay - my apologies for the rant and the length of the email.  But this is just getting ridiculous .  People are dying in thousands because of it  And they are all people who should be enjoying their retirement and golden years right now.  So  Please, Shawn,  stop these bastards because I for one am tired of being a guinea pig or test subject for them. turn the table on this reality and create the truth for all to see......  even if you ran a truth propaganda campaign with names and such - let em sue ya for slander and prove you wrong.... Don't pay more money into their court system -  it takes years for interpretation of some laws and in the meantime - lives are lost.  It takes years in court - in the meantime - people die.  Don't play their game - it's what they expect you to do and what they want you to do .  In the meantime - people forget, people die.  And before you know it - you wonder how it got this way.....it's all been planned to happen that way ..   But do use this Charter of Health Freedom as a smoke and mirrors until you can research and compile enough for one big exposure.  It is so nice to have the law on the side of the people for a change.

What else is possible and how can it get any better than this?  And as Father Rick from NPH.org  says in Haiti - If not now - When?

And please, tell Geri about RSO and let her decide for herself if she wishes to break the law to save her life or not.     

Linda Ley R.C.R.T.

Registered Reflexolgy Therapist

Footflexes Blog


On 1 December 2012 17:04, NHPPA <info@nhppa.org> wrote:


NEW ARTICLE IN ALIVE MAGAZINE

SAFE OR UNSAFE? CANADA'S RISKY NATURAL HEALTH PRODUCTS REGULATIONS

In his article, Safe or Unsafe?, Shawn Buckley tells the tale of Geri, a woman who has lived with breast cancer for 25 years, and who attributes her longevity to Natural Health Products (NHPs). 'Upon assumption of danger', NHPs that Canadian citizens depend on for their health and wellbeing are being systematically removed from store shelves. As catalogued to date, over 20,000 foreign products, including some that have been used safely for centuries, are no longer available to stores in Canada. Shawn relates that Geri: "...truly cannot understand why a natural remedy she relies on to stay alive is being taken away from her. She certainly does not feel protected or safe because of the regulations.”

The NHPPA was thrilled to be offered space in one of Canada's most respected and widely circulated natural health magazines to let readers know about the The Charter of Health Freedom! Close to 200,000 citizens will pick up the print version of Alive in one of 900 stores across the country and learn about "a proactive law which, while giving the Government more teeth to address real dangers, would also require a balancing between an individual's need for a remedy and the State's goal of addressing real risks."

The harm the current regulations are causing is no longer an academic question. The regulations are impacting real people like you and I.

Shawn calls us all to action in the article:

Make a difference by:

·         educating yourself

·         supporting groups working to protect natural remedies

·         signing the petition for the Charter of Health Freedom

·         writing to your MP and the prime minister about your concerns

CLICK HERE to read Shawn Buckley's article Safe or Unsafe? published in Alive Magazine (Dec 2012)

CLICK HERE to go to an interactive explanation of the Charter of Health Freedom

Protecting your access and freedom,
Natural Health Products Protection Association | NHPPA | 1.519.648.2050 | 5070 Fountain Street North, Breslau, ON N0B 1M0


Join NHPPA on Facebook | Follow NHPPA on Twitter | Watch us on YouTube




date: 7 May 2013 at 19:06 subject: Response from NHPPA | Linda Ley | NHPPA E-Blast: December 1 2012 | Shawn's New Article in Alive Magazine: Safe or Unsafe? : Important mainly because of the people in the conversation.

NHPPA info@nhppa.org

07/05/2013
to me


from:NHPPA info@nhppa.org
reply-to:info@nhppa.org
to:abcdefgsusieq4u@gmail.com
date:7 May 2013 at 19:06
subject:Response from NHPPA | Linda Ley | NHPPA E-Blast: December 1 2012 | Shawn's New Article in Alive Magazine: Safe or Unsafe?
:Important mainly because of the people in the conversation.
Hello Linda,

Thank you so much for your email, which has been passed to Shawn for his information. Our apologies that it has taken so long to get back to you. We work on an extremely tight budget, trying to make best use of our supporters’ financial help as our only source of income. Since so much of our work involves expensive legal research and the funding of lectures and interviews, we have had to economize on clerical workers and online staff for responding to inquiries in order to keep our core work going.

You are of course right that the current situation is unconstitutional, and it takes a keen legal mind to see that. Your considered and remarkably accurate email gives us pause to think that someone like yourself is able to carry gravity in conversation when educating the public in your sphere of influence.

We are fortunate to have Shawn's experience of constitutional law behind our legal challenge to Health Canada and the 2004 NHP Regulations but we have not stopped there. You can CLICK HERE to see the variety of legal frameworks we plan to refer to when we get to court. We have assembled a team of legal experts with experience in each field and they have completed their research. We are currently at the point of identifying parties with standing to be part of our case.

We do know of other organizations which are trying different legal approaches, they may well be invoking grounds that are different than ours. We all do what we know best and together we hope that the joint pushback from citizens and stakeholders will restore our rights and freedoms.

As the lawyers research, there are many things that citizens can do to get the word out to our elected representatives that we won’t have our freedom to choose taken away from us. We encourage everyone who writes to us to also write or visit their MP. You can CLICK HERE for some tools to help with this. We are also asking everyone to check that their local health food store has a petition station. The Charter of Health Freedom petitionhas just passed 90,000 signatures. It is currently set to become the third largest federal petition in the last 15 years,in Canada. We have to beat 96,065 and when we do, it will create quite a stir when we take it to Ottawa.
If your local store needs information materials, or if you can think of anywhere else to place a petition, you canCLICK HERE for more details and printable files.

Thank you for your personal involvement. Our freedom will be restored by citizens like you who take the time to engage and communicate!

Regards,

~ Carolyn

Protecting your access and freedom,
Carolyn Steele | Information Officer | NHPPA | 1.519.648.2050 | 5070 Fountain Street North, Breslau, ON N0B 1M0

cid:image001.png@01CBEF89.E439EAB0

Join NHPPA on Facebook | Follow NHPPA on Twitter | Watch us on YouTube


Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: NHPPA E-Blast: December 1 2012 | Shawn's New Article in Alive Magazine: Safe or Unsafe?
  
Many thanks for the information and the work you are doing towards this cause.

But I am asking the question - what else is possible here?

I worked at the Constitutional Law Branch in Toronto a few years back and have had several other "legal" administrative positions over the years for the government.  I also have experience in records and information management.

What I am getting at is that this cause needs to be tied together with some history and a better approach legally and in the courts. 

What we have here is an elite society that has written their intent to poison the public and they have done it over the last 70 years through legislation and controls and regulations.  It is well known that our foods have been poisoned with GMO's and that federal agencies refuse to label or advise of foods unsafe - or believe reports other than from the pharmeceutical and pesticide corporations.  There are whistle blowers everywhere that are afraid to talk or have been frightened enough to stay silent - or have been financially ruined to keep them off their ass.  It starts to get messy when big corporations fall - ask Enron.

And perhaps the key here may be corporation law........ (I believe there individual stakeholders that are using corporate and administrative approaches for their independent legal actions but since Shawn and his team developed the strategy and completed the research, grounds relating to what she is referring to may or may not be in our approach.) step outside the box - take a look at the whole picture and the cause.  Instead of playing the game of masking symptoms - cure the cause.

As a citizen of canada I am a part of the "franchise" of Her Majesty in England.  The country is a legal entity - it's set up as a franchise - and the politicians are employees. The Queen is the ultimate employer.....  What does that make the citizens who financially support the corporation of the Dominion of Canada?   Articles of Incorporation should be public knowledge.  There are corporations set up everywhere to fund the elite.  Canon Law, British Law, Canadian Law , Corporate Law- what law governs the people of any country? What law governs the government?  Are we the product or service of the corporation?  What law has precedence over whom? (She is asking questions that Shawn or Selick can respond to but I don’t feel like engaging with her here a) because I can’t answer and b) because it’s a time sink) 

 The country's laws keep changing over the years to protect the guilty.  follow the money , follow the family, follow the elite- the country is in this for profit and it's coming from 99% of the population and going to only 1% of those in power.  What law can the people use against a country that in one generation convinces it's subjects to smoke cigarettes (more doctors smoke camels) and in another generation, promotes anti depressants for kids, puts GMO in the food supply, poisons 10,000 year old water aquifers with chlorine and flouride,  puts millions into new schools and training of a whole generation again in caring for an ageing and ill baby boomer generation created by their actions of affecting the health of us loyal subjects.  Are you aware that a whole workforce of RPN's has been retrained to do the same job as an RN at half the cost?  and Personal Support Workers do the job of an RPN at yet half that cost.   Yup - learned that one from an RPN and former real estate agent. (us 50 somethings are having a hard time with getting to retirement without retraining these days.)

What I am getting at is - figure out the conspiracy theory - who the real players are here and then hit them below the belt where they least expect it. Get into the Enron of Records Management techniques.  Natural products can't be trademarked and made money off them. (It's why Hemp is illegal - it would have killed the cancer cure industry they were creating.....)  Wouldn't the same principle apply to licencing?  We already have a constitution for the people - lets enforce it and then this whole Charter of Health Freedoms isn't necessary - make it a codicil to the original Charter.....make a law that is undeniably accurate and does not require interpretation......black ball em.....list specifics, names, etc..... (Ug)

In just over two decades, the Constitution Act, 1982 has had a predictably enormous impact on constitutional law. The most important section of the Constitution Act, 1982, both for the legal community and for the general population, has been the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter"). The Supreme Court of Canada has spent most of the past twenty years interpreting the Charter, an in so doing, has caused governments and lawyers to rewrite the basic rules of almost every area of public law.

Before the Charter came into effect, Canadian law had a melange of legal human rights protections. For the average person, they worked very well, although what most people now consider enormous injustices were legally inflicted on some. The Supreme Court of Canada held that the Unwritten Constitution protected some human rights. In Roncarelli v.Duplessis, [1959] 121., the Court ruled that the Constitution protected the people from arbitrary action by government officials. The federal government enacted the Canadian Bill of Rights in 1960, although it is now remembered mainly for the occasions that courts refused to apply it. In addition, some provinces had human rights legislation which forbade people from exercising their civil rights in discriminatory ways. However, as a general rule, no instrument permitted courts to strike down laws which violated human rights. This changed in 1982 by virtue of s. 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982, which stated that any law that violated the Constitution, including the new part of the Constitution containing theCharter, was of no force or effect.

In order to give full effect to the Charter, the Supreme Court of Canada decided to give the Charter a "broad and liberal interpretation." (R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295). The Court adopted a "purposive" approach, asking what the purpose of protecting the rights in question are, and giving effect to those purposes through the Court's interpretations of their meanings. This contrasts with the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Canadian Bill of Rights, in which the meaning of the words of the Bill were interpreted so narrowly that the Bill protected virtually no rights in practice.

According to s.32, the Charter applies to "the Parliament and government of Canada" and the "legislature and government of each province". It does not apply to private individuals or corporations   http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Canadian_Constitutional_Law/Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms

Will we need licences to grow tomatoes next?   It is only when we add unnatural ingredients that they have the control is it not? And yet they ad unnatural ingredients to our water and food supply and years later we find out it's killing us.....and they profit both ways - from the use and the after effect....... And yet natural hemp oil that cures cancer and almost any disease on the planet is illegal?  Why?

The Rick Simpson Story - Run From The Cure   But when you research the reason it is illegal and realize the propaganda that has been spread by our own country over the years and how its affected the health of the people - surely will find some legal law that can expel some government officials with enough proof - just like Mr. Ford was deposed as Mayor of Toronto Recently. 

Apparently there is some legislation somewhere that if a politician lies in office or does something for personal financial gain or something - they gotta leave?  How does corporate law work with directors that do the same thing?  If the constitution doesn't cover corporations  or individuals - does that mean we have no rights?  That the game is rigged?  Elections Act - I mean - when a constitution of a country is created - somewhere in there it's gotta read we have the right to life and if your own mother is poisoning you so she can create jobs and hospitals and rich politicians and unethical corporations for her own financial gain - well something has got to be illegal somewhere.

I mean - I work all my life for a pension that may not now be guaranteed to me in 7 years time.  I am currently unemployed and have been for 16 months.  I can't even get a response from, Walmart,  Mikey Dees or Timmy's for a minimum wage job. (Oh boy)  My locked in pension that they allowed me to access - resulted in me owing 40 grand in taxes, I am currently bankrupt and have about enough money left to live 2 more months where I am right now.  Most of my earned rrsp and locked in pension funds has dwindled and I'm two years short of early retirement.  Don't qualify for disability pensions because I refuse to take the meds.  (don't get me going on the psych part of this story - if you think Timmy's is a licence for money - you should see the mental health side of any general hospital)  My EI is exhausted for this lifetime as I have now collected for two years straight - 2009 and 20011/12 in 40 years - and without finding work - no more help.  Welfare in Ontario - gone - it's Ontario Works now - $599 a month and I gotta spend my bank account and get down to my last $599 before I can apply.  I'm two years short of early retirement pension at 60.  Not sure what the new year will bring.....but I'm working on believing in miracles here.

So.....I followed the rules all my life - I played the game they kept changing and then 2008 rolls around and Wham Bam Thank You Maam........they pull the rug out because of the world financial crisis.....   Now it's strange that we keep bailing out the crooked bankers and politicians instead of hitting them where we can - in the archives.  Yes - as of Jan 1 of this year - it's now covered under Freedom of Information and that's where they got ya.  They keep it hidden.  But some corporate records are public - like municipal roll books and Land Registry Offices and Corporate Nuances.  And some private records are always public for the money,  Hell, for 20 bucks you can get a name and address with a plate you see off the highway.  Personal freedoms are breached everywhere.  It's open season on us these days between Iran, the States and Mother Nature, Insurance and Flouride in our water.   You pay ma bell to see what number is calling you and they pay ma bell to hide their number so it comes up as unlisted........happens all the frikin time.  Ma Bell gets double the money and neither customer gets a phone number that they paid for.

 Get "natural" corporations to band together for one source of information - greater strength in numbers and we're all on the same side - many natural cures. - massage therapists, reflexologists, holistic doctors, naturopaths.  I bet if you came up with a conference to coordinate - you'd get a lot of attendees.

Find where they've changed the laws and haven't had the foresight to change other laws to correspond....... just find the reasons, the backers and the truths and put them all together and .over 70 years there has got to be mistakes.  Follow the money.  check out online about the corporations set up by Canada such as our Canada Pension Funds.  Check out these "corporations" and see who the shareholders and owners are - one to start with - ALL the federally deregulated corporations like Air Canada, Canadian Airlines, CNR, CPR, CBC, CRTC, Communications Canada,  see who owns them now and see who controls the country.  It's all corporations.  Yes - go back to 1996 and then go back to the  40's, 50's 60's and 70's and 80's and see where the changes were made - which political party -and better still - who was with that political party - who he smoozed with - do you know that Liberals and Conservatives only changes sides when the money is good?  Find out which privatized federal corporations sold "assets" to which private corporations and then follow the money.......  Start an org chart of business and show the connection and start with the top - the queen........it's a pyramid scheme no?  And check out which pharmaceutical company has control over Canada - it's Pftzer I believe. 

So let's get them in corporate law - civil law - mass law suits from the people - never mind trying to fight a bear in his own den on a charter of rights that will only be ignored after inception  - or a pig in the mud hole -  they've been swindling us for almost a hundred years and they friggin enjoy mud on their face and all over their bodies....a pig loves the mud....... if not more -    It's time to stop the swine flu once and for all   99% can let the 1% know that enough is enough.  They are killing us with their pharmaceuticals, GMOs and corporate greed.
  
Okay - my apologies for the rant and the length of the email.  But this is just getting ridiculous .  People are dying in thousands because of it  And they are all people who should be enjoying their retirement and golden years right now.  So  Please, Shawn,  stop these bastards because I for one am tired of being a guinea pig or test subject for them. turn the table on this reality and create the truth for all to see......  even if you ran a truth propaganda campaign with names and such - let em sue ya for slander and prove you wrong.... Don't pay more money into their court system -  it takes years for interpretation of some laws and in the meantime - lives are lost.  It takes years in court - in the meantime - people die.  Don't play their game - it's what they expect you to do and what they want you to do .  In the meantime - people forget, people die.  And before you know it - you wonder how it got this way.....it's all been planned to happen that way ..   But do use this Charter of Health Freedom as a smoke and mirrors until you can research and compile enough for one big exposure.  It is so nice to have the law on the side of the people for a change.

What else is possible and how can it get any better than this?  And as Father Rick from NPH.org  says in Haiti - If not now - When?

And please, tell Geri about RSO and let her decide for herself if she wishes to break the law to save her life or not.     

Linda Ley R.C.R.T.

Registered Reflexolgy Therapist

Footflexes Blog


On 1 December 2012 17:04, NHPPA <info@nhppa.org> wrote:


NEW ARTICLE IN ALIVE MAGAZINE

SAFE OR UNSAFE? CANADA'S RISKY NATURAL HEALTH PRODUCTS REGULATIONS

In his article, Safe or Unsafe?, Shawn Buckley tells the tale of Geri, a woman who has lived with breast cancer for 25 years, and who attributes her longevity to Natural Health Products (NHPs). 'Upon assumption of danger', NHPs that Canadian citizens depend on for their health and wellbeing are being systematically removed from store shelves. As catalogued to date, over 20,000 foreign products, including some that have been used safely for centuries, are no longer available to stores in Canada. Shawn relates that Geri: "...truly cannot understand why a natural remedy she relies on to stay alive is being taken away from her. She certainly does not feel protected or safe because of the regulations.”

The NHPPA was thrilled to be offered space in one of Canada's most respected and widely circulated natural health magazines to let readers know about the The Charter of Health Freedom! Close to 200,000 citizens will pick up the print version of Alive in one of 900 stores across the country and learn about "a proactive law which, while giving the Government more teeth to address real dangers, would also require a balancing between an individual's need for a remedy and the State's goal of addressing real risks."

The harm the current regulations are causing is no longer an academic question. The regulations are impacting real people like you and I.

Shawn calls us all to action in the article:

Make a difference by:

·         educating yourself

·         supporting groups working to protect natural remedies

·         signing the petition for the Charter of Health Freedom

·         writing to your MP and the prime minister about your concerns

CLICK HERE to read Shawn Buckley's article Safe or Unsafe? published in Alive Magazine (Dec 2012)

CLICK HERE to go to an interactive explanation of the Charter of Health Freedom

Protecting your access and freedom,
Natural Health Products Protection Association | NHPPA | 1.519.648.2050 | 5070 Fountain Street North, Breslau, ON N0B 1M0


Join NHPPA on Facebook | Follow NHPPA on Twitter | Watch us on YouTube